Completeness_Report: A map unit is a collection of areas defined and named in terms of
their soil components or miscellaneous areas or both. Each map
unit differs in some respect from all others in a survey area and
each map unit has a symbol that uniquely identifies the map unit
on a soil map. Each individual area, point, or line so identified
on the map is a delineation.
Soil Scientists identify small areas of soils or miscellaneous areas
that have properties and behavior significantly different than the
named soils in the surrounding map unit. These minor components
may be indicated as special features. If they have a minimal effect
on use and management, or could not be precisely located, they many
not be indicated on the map.
A map unit has specified kinds of soils or miscellaneous areas
(map unit components), each with a designated range in
proportionate extent. Map units include one or more kinds of soil
or miscellaneous area. Miscellaneous areas are areas that have little
or no recognizable soil.
Specific National Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures
were used in the classification of soils, design and name of map
units, and location of special soil features. These standards are
outlined in Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993,
USDA, NRCS; Agricultural Handbook 436, Soil Taxonomy, 1995,
USDA, NRCS; and all Amendments; Keys to Soil Taxonomy,
(current issue) USDA, NRCS; National Soil Survey
Handbook, title 430-VI,(current issue) USDA, NRCS.
The actual composition and interpretive purity of the map unit
delineations were based on data collected by scientists during
the course of preparing the soil maps. Adherence to National
Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures is based on
peer review, quality control, and quality assurance. Quality
control is outlined in the memorandum of understanding for the
soil survey area and in documents that reside with the Natural
Resources Conservation Service state soil scientist. Four kinds
of map units are used in soil surveys: consociations, complexes,
associations, and undifferentiated groups.
Consociations - Consociations are named for the dominant soil.
In a consociation, delineated areas use a single name from the
dominant component in the map unit. Dissimilar components are
minor in extent. The soil component in a consociation may be
identified at any taxonomic level. Soil series is the lowest
taxonomic level. A consociation that is named as a miscellaneous
area is dominantly that kind of area and minor components do not
significantly affect the use of the map unit. The total amount of
dissimilar inclusions of other components in a map unit generally
does not exceed about 15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if
nonlimiting. A single component of a dissimilar limiting inclusion
generally does not exceed 10 percent if very contrasting.
Complexes and associations - Complexes and associations consist
of two or more dissimilar components that occur in a regularly
repeating pattern. The total amount of other dissimilar components
is minor extent. The following arbitrary rule determines whether
complex or association is used in the name. The major components
of an association can be separated at the scale of mapping. In
either case, because the major components are sufficiently different
in morphology or behavior, the map unit cannot be called a
consociation. In each delineation of a complex or an association,
each major component is normally present though their proportions
may vary appreciably from one delineation to another. The total
amount of inclusions in a map unit that are dissimilar to any of
the major components does not exceed 15 percent if limiting and
25 percent if nonlimiting. A single kind of dissimilar limiting
inclusion usually does not exceed 10 percent.
Undifferentiated groups - Undifferentiated groups consist of two
or more components that are not consistently associated
geographically and, therefore, do not always occur together in
the same map delineation. These components are included in the
same named map unit because their use and management are the same
or very similar for common uses. Generally they are grouped together
because some common feature, such as steepness, stoniness, or
flooding, determines their use and management. If two or more
additional map units would serve no useful purpose, they may be
included in the same unit. Each delineation has at least one of the
major components, and some may have all of them. The same principles
regarding the proportion of minor components that apply to
consociations also apply to undifferentiated groups. The same
principles regarding proportion of inclusion apply to
undifferentiated groups as to consociations.
Minimum documentation consists of three complete soil profile
descriptions that are collected for each soil added to the legend,
one additional per 3,000 acres mapped; three 10 observation
transects for each map unit, one additional 10 point transect per
3,000 acres.
A defined standard or level of confidence in the interpretive
purity of the map unit delineations is attained by adjusting the
kind and intensity of field investigations. Field investigations
and data collection are carried out in sufficient detail to name
map units and to identify accurately and consistently areas of
about 2 acres.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural
Stabilization and Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1972
Title: multiple photographs
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural
Stabilization and Conservation Service
Source_Scale_Denominator: 15840
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1972
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photographs were flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: ASCS1
Source_Contribution: base material for survey
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricutlural
Stabilizatoin and Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1972
Title: multiple photographs
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricutlural
Stablization and Conservation Service
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1972
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photographs were flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: ASCS2
Source_Contribution: base material for survey
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: Soil Survey of Clinton County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 15840
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1995
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1
Source_Contribution:
information for soil map unit
delineations, special soil feature locations, and
data on soil properties
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: publication annotation overlay
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 15840
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1995
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS2
Source_Contribution:
final publication negatives
used to develop ratioed film positives
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 1976, 1981
Title: multiple 7.5 minute orthophoto quadrangles
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Menlo Park, California
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1976
Ending_Date: 1981
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS1
Source_Contribution: compilation base map source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 1964-1993
Title: multiple 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Reston, Virginia
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1964
Ending_Date: 1993
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS2
Source_Contribution: source material for county borders
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: soil delineation overlay
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1995
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS4
Source_Contribution: scanning source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 20020702
Title:
Digital Rastor Graphic Mosaic of Clinton County,
New York (DRG)
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: rastor digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/
Publisher:
U.S Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: unknown
Source_Currentness_Reference: source map
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS5
Source_Contribution:
county boundary source for areas not defined by
a water body
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, FSA-APFO
Publication_Date: 20031008
Title:
USDA-FSA-APFO Digital Ortho Mosaic of Clinton County,
New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/
Publisher:
U.S Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1994
Ending_Date: 1995
Source_Currentness_Reference:
majority years of photography date for
MDOQs
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS6
Source_Contribution:
county boundary source for the boundary that is
defined by a water body
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1998
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Clinton
County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography
and Geospatial Center
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1998
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS7
Source_Contribution: rearchiving source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2005
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Type_of_Source_Media: database
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2005
Ending_Date: 2005
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Source_Contribution: attribute (tabular) information
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: region 12 soils geodatabase
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: file geodatabase
Type_of_Source_Media: vector digital data
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2006
Ending_Date: 2012
Source_Currentness_Reference: SSURGO publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS8
Source_Contribution: Source of digital revision
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Field procedures for the second order soil
survey included plotting of soil boundaries determined by field
observations and by interpretation of remotely sensed data.
Boundaries were verified at closely spaced intervals and the soils
in each delination were identified by traversing and transecting
the landscape. Soil scientists described and sampled the soils,
analyzed the samples in the laboratory, and statistically analyzed
the data. The classification and map unit names were finalized
at the final correlation in March 1995.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: ASCS1, ASCS2
Process_Date: 1995
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Ratioed film positives, 1:24000 scale, were
made from the final publication negatives. Soil map unit
delineations and special soil features were manually compiled
from the ratioed film positives to an overlay registered to
the 7.5 minute orthophoto quadrangles. Errors from map unit
boundaries on the aerial photographs were refined, as needed
to the orthophoto imagery.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS2, NRCS3, USGS1, NRCS4
Process_Date: 1995
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The soil delineation overlays were raster
scanned by Midwest Graphics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin at 250 dpi on
an Intergraph Anatech scanner in rlc format. Four control points
corresponding the four corners on the 7.5 minute quarangles
were used for registration during data collection. The data
were sent to the Wisconsin Digitizing Unit, Madison, Wisconsin.
The county borders were manually digitized from the 7.5 minute
USGS topographic quadrangles in LT4X Version 4.02 on a Sun UNIX
Workstation and exported and snapped together using GRASS
Version 4.13 and then imported back into LT4X. The special
soil features were manually digitized from the digitizing source
in LT4X at a resolution of at least 0.01 inch. The raster editing,
labeling, edge matching, vector conversion, and editing were done
in LT4X Version 4.02. The data were created in North American
Datum of 1927. Check plots of the soils and special soil features
were reviewed by a soil scientist and cartographic staff at the
Wisconsin Digitizing Unit, Madison, Wisconsin and USDA-NRCS State
Office, Syrcause, New York. The soils and special soil features
were exported to GRASS Version 4.13 using the v.export command.
The digital files were exported as a Digital Line Graphic-3 Optional
format using the v.out.dlg command. DLG-3 Optional format files
were evaluated with the February 1998 ARC/INFO SSURGO Evaluation
AMLs provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center,
Fort Worth, Texas. Upon successful completion of SSURGO Evaluation,
the DLGs were rewritten from ARC/INFO Version 7.1.1. The new DLGs
were rechecked with the February 1998 ARC/INFO Evaluation AMLs.
These new DLGs were processed with the archiving AMLs provided by
National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
ASCS1, ASCS2, USGS1, USGS2, NRCS1,
NRCS2
Process_Date: 1998
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
A new border was put on Clinton County, New York by
the USDA-NRCS Wisconsin Digitizing Unit in Madison, Wisconsin (WIDU)
for a join with Essex County, New York. There are some non-joins in
survey due to water level differences between the imagery used for the
county boundary and the original compilation. The data were then run
through the Rearchiving AMLs provided by the National Cartography
and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas (NCGC) for quality assurance
and distribution formatting to comply with SSURGO standards. Once the
digital soils data completed all the checks, they were submitted to the
Soil Data Warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS5, NRCS6, NRCS7
Process_Date: 2005
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051007
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051007
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051212
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051214
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060708
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060708
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061210
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Tabular data was entered/edited in NASIS for geomorphic description and
selected chemical and physical properties. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the
labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular
database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data
Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and
the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map
units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and
reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil
Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061211
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20070911
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Tabular data updated to include component data for map units BcC and BsD
(missing in previous version). The Natural Resources Conservation Service
State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized
soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the
joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the
data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were
extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data
delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data
were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20070911
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20100202
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Soil scientists reviewed and edited data for hydric rating and hydric
criteria. Interpretations for storm water management were added to the set
of interpretations. The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil
Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map
units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version
number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data
warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted
from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data
model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to
the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20100205
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20111206
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Hydric ratings for minor soil components were included in the data set.
Hydrologic Soil Group data was updated to current criteria.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate
verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units
in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to
the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp
were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data
for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and
reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil
Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20111206
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20120919
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Updated hydrologic soil group for Bice components.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate
verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units
in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to
the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp
were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data
for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and
reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil
Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20120921
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The spatial data for Clinton County, New York soil survey area was
downloaded from the Soil Data Mart on October 15, 2012. The individual
shapefiles were appended into a geodatabase for region 12. The data were
processed in ARCGIS 10.1 using a topology object with a 0.1 meter cluster
tolerance for the purpose of eliminating gaps and overlaps within the
region 12 soils geodatabase. Individual soil survey area data were
exported as shapefiles from the regional geodatabase. A datum
transformation from NAD83 to WGS84 using the NAD_1983_To_WGS_1984_1 datum
transformation method was applied to the data. The data were checked with
the SSURGO Evaluation scripts provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service. The shapefiles were then uploaded
to the soil data warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS8
Process_Date: 2013
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20131124
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20131124
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20140913
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20140913
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20150925
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20150925
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20160923
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20160923