Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Chemistry
and Soils
Publication_Date: 1925
Title: Soil Survey of St. Lawrence County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Washington, D. C.
Publisher: U.S. Government Printing Office
Source_Scale_Denominator: 62500
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1925
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: BCS1
Source_Contribution:
information for soil map unit delineations,
special soil feature locations, and data on soil properties
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 1962
Title: multiple aerial photographs
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural
Stabilization and Conservation Service
Source_Scale_Denominator: 15840
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1962
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS1
Source_Contribution:
base materials for field mapping of the more
detailed portion of the soil survey area
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural
Stabilization and Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1968
Title: multiple aerial photographs
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural
Stabilization and Conservation Service
Source_Scale_Denominator: 15840
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1968
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: ASCS1
Source_Contribution:
photographic base map materials for field
mapping of the more detailed portion of the soil survey area
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 1984, 1985
Title: multiple aerial photographs
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Menlo Park, California
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator: 62500
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1984
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS2
Source_Contribution:
photographic base map materials for field
mapping of the less detailed portion of the soil survey area
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: multiple soil maps on a photographic base
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 15840
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1962
Ending_Date: 1972
Source_Currentness_Reference: dates of field mapping
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1
Source_Contribution:
conservation plan mapping and other special
request soil mapping used as a reference for the more detailed
portion of the soil survey area
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: multiple film positives of 7.5 minute orthophotoquads
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1987
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS2
Source_Contribution: base map for compilation
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: multiple film positives of 15 minute orthophotoquads
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Source_Scale_Denominator: 62500
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1987
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS3
Source_Contribution: base map for compilation
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 1943-1994
Title: multiple 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Reston, Virginia
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1943
Ending_Date: 1994
Source_Currentness_Reference: final publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS3
Source_Contribution: source for digital county boundaries
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: multiple ratioed film positives of field sheets
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1968
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS4
Source_Contribution:
source material for special soil features, soil
polygons and soil attributes
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title:
multiple ratioed film positives of 15 minute
orthophotoquads
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1987
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS5
Source_Contribution:
compiled source material for special soil
features, soil polygon and soil attributes
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: annotated soil delineation overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1995
Ending_Date: 1999
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS6
Source_Contribution: scanning source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title:
compressed DLGs, metadata, and tables for St. Lawrence
County, New York (2nd order more detailed survey-Northern
Part) Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form digital data
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2000
Source_Currentness_Reference:
date reflecting changes in digital
survey
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS7
Source_Contribution:
certified data to be merged with southern part
of Lawrence County for full county SSURGO Review
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2000
Title:
DLGs, metadata, and tabular information of St. Lawrence
County, New York (3rd order less detailed-Southern Part)
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: digital data
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: 8 mm tape
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2000
Source_Currentness_Reference:
date reflecting changes in digital
survey (sent to Wisconsin)
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS8
Source_Contribution: source for SSURGO Review
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2000
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for St. Lawrence
County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography
and Geospatial Center
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2000
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS9
Source_Contribution: re-archiving source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2002
Title:
National Soil Information System (NASIS) database
for St. Lawrence County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, Information Technology
Center
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2002
Source_Currentness_Reference: export certification date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS10
Source_Contribution: tabular data linked to spatial soil data
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2004
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: unknown
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Type_of_Source_Media: database
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2004
Ending_Date: 2004
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Source_Contribution: attribute (tabular) information
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2006
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for St. Lawrence
County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography
and Geospatial Center
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2006
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS11
Source_Contribution: re-archiving source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: region 12 soils geodatabase
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: file geodatabase
Type_of_Source_Media: vector digital data
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2006
Ending_Date: 2012
Source_Currentness_Reference: SSURGO publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS12
Source_Contribution: Source of digital revision
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Soil Survey of St. Lawrence County, New York
began in 1973. Field work was aided by the 1925 Soil Survey of St.
Lawrence County, New York and Conservation Plan Mapping that
occurred principally from 1962-1972. A detailed evaluation was
done to determine how much of this early mapping was useful. The
northern part (more detailed portion of the soil survey area)
1,100,000 acres of the county were mapped at a scale of 1:15840
scale. The southern part (less detailed portion of the soil survey
area) of the county was mapped at a scale of 1:62500 scale. The
soil survey concluded in July, 1990 with a final correlation that
finalized the classification and map unit names.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: BCS1, USGS1, ASCS1, USGS2, NRCS1
Process_Date: 1990
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial
Center, Fort Worth, Texas, used a photographic process to prepare
stable-base orthophotoquad positives from orthophotographs for
compilation. These were prepared for the more detailed portion of
the soil survey area of the survey area at scale 1:24000. These
1:24000 orthophotoquads were mosaicked together to create a 15
minute orthophotoquad film positive at 1:62500 scale for use in the
less detailed soil survey area.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS2, NRCS3, NRCS5
Process_Date: 1987
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
For the more detailed portion of the survey
area, ratioed film positives at 1:24000 scale, were produced from
the 1:15840 scale field sheets. The special soil features
data, on the ratioed film positives, were compiled to the
orthophotoquad film positives onto a stable-base scan overlay.
The compilation was completed by Natural Resources Conservation
Service, Pennsylvania Compilation Unit, State College,
Pennsylvania.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS1, ASCS1, NRCS1, NRCS2, NRCS4
Process_Date: 1990
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
For the less detailed portion of the survey
area, the 1:62500 aerial photo field sheets were compiled to
1:62500 orthophotoquad film positives by soil scientists from
the Natural Resources Conservation Service in New York. This
annotated orthophotoquad was later enlarged photographically to
1:24000 scale, and was recompiled to a 1:24000 orthophotoquad film
positive onto a stable-base scan overlay. This recompilation was
performed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service at West
Virginia compilation unit in Summersville, West Virginia.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS2, NRCS3, NRCS5
Process_Date: 1999
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The digitizing of the soil and special soil
features data for the more detailed portion of the survey area
was completed by contract administered by the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center,
Fort Worth, Texas. The contractor used custom software for data
capture and export in Digital Line Graph Optional format. The data
were created and maintained in the North American Datum of 1927.
The county boundaries were manually digitized from the 7.5 minute
USGS topographic quadrangles. The digital maps of soil lines and
special soil features were reviewed by the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center,
SSURGO Support Section imported the data for verification in
ARC/INFO Version 7.1.4. The data were edited. Upon successful
completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the DLGs were rewritten from
ARC/INFO Version 7.1.1 on a Sun UNIX Workstation. The new ARC/INFO
version DLGs were rechecked with the October 1998 ARC/INFO SSURGO
Evaluation AMLs. The DLGs were processed with the October 1998
archiving AMLs provided by National Cartography and Geospatial
Center, Fort Worth, Texas.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS3, NRCS6
Process_Date: 1998
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The 7.5 minute quadrangle soil map unit
delineation overlays for the less detailed portion of the survey
area were raster scanned by Midwest Graphics, Kenosha, Wisconsin
at 250 dpi on an Intergraph Anatech scanner in rlc format. Four
control points corresponding to the four corners on the 7.5 minute
quadrangles were used for registration during data collection. The
data were sent to the Bangor, Maine NRCS State Office. The county
boundaries were manually digitized from the 7.5 minute USGS
topographic quadrangles in LT4X Version 4.11 on a Sun UNIX
Workstation. The special soil features were manually digitized
from the scanning source in LT4X at a resolution of 0.01 inch. The
raster editing, labeling, edge matching, vector conversion were done
in LT4X Version 4.11. Check plots of the soils and special soil
features were reviewed by a soil scientist. The soils and special
soil features files were exported to Digital Line Graph-3 Optional
format files directly out of LT4X Version 4.11.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS3, NRCS6
Process_Date: 2000
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The DLGs, metadata, and tabular data of the
less detailed portion of St. Lawrence County, New York were sent to
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, Wisconsin Digitizing Unit, Madison, Wisconsin for SSURGO
Evaluation. The DLG-3 Optional format files were evaluated with
the October 1998 ARC/INFO Evaluation AMLs provided by U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service,
National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas. The
DLGs and tabular data of the more detailed portion of St. Lawrence
County were download and merged with the less detailed portion.
The files were evaluated with October 1998 ARC/INFO Evaluation AMLs
provided by National Cartography and Geospatial Center. Upon
successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the DLGs were
rechecked with the October 1998 ARC/INFO SSURGO Evaluation AMLs.
The DLGs were processed with the October 1998 archiving AMLs
provided by National Cartography and Geospatial Center.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS7, NRCS8
Process_Date: 2000
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Map Unit Interpretations Record data
base was developed by the Natural Resources Conservation
Service soil scientists according to national standards.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: BCS1
Process_Date: 2000
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The National Soil Information System database was
developed by Natural Resources Conservation Service soil scientists
according to national standards.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: BSC1
Process_Date: 2002
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The online SSURGO data were imported into
ARC/INFO Version 7.2.1 at the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, Wisconsin Digitizing Unit. Digital edits were made to
approximately 75% of the survey for mapfinishing purposes. The
data were then processed with the revised Oct. 1998 ARC/INFO
AML's. Minor codes were replaced to link spatial data map units
to the National Soil Information System (NASIS) database. Map
unit acres from the spatial data were used to populate the
NASIS database developed by NRCS soil scientists according to
national standards. New DLGs were written from the edited
spatial data and, along with the NASIS SSURGO download tabular
data, were processed with April 2001 archiving AML's provided
by National Cartography and Geospatial Center Fort Worth,
Texas (NCGC). The certified data were then ftped to NCGC for
archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS9, NRCS10
Process_Date: 2002
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20040306
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20040308
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20041021
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20041021
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The SSURGO database of St. Lawrence County,
New York was downloaded from U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography
and Geospatial Center (NCGC) distribution site for the purpose
of updating the survey area boundary to be consistent with the Jefferson
County, New York SSURGO dataset. The data were then run through the
20040524 ReCert AMLs provided by NCGC and submitted to the Soil Data
Warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS11
Process_Date: 2006
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060522
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060710
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060711
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061211
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Soil scientists entered/edited data in NASIS for
geomorphic description and selected chemical and physical properties.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate
verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units
in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to
the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp
were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data
for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and
reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil
Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061211
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20100204
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Soil scientists reviewed and edited data for hydric rating and hydric
criteria. Interpretations for storm water management were added to the set
of interpretations. The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil
Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map
units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version
number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data
warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted
from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data
model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to
the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20100205
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20111208
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Hydric ratings for minor soil components were included in the data set.
Hydrologic Soil Group data was updated to current criteria.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate
verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units
in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to
the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp
were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data
for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and
reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil
Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20111208
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20120918
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Updated hydrologic soil group in Berkshire components.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate
verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units
in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to
the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp
were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data
for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and
reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil
Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20120921
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The spatial data for St. Lawrence County, New York soil survey area was
downloaded from the Soil Data Mart on October 15, 2012. The individual
shapefiles were appended into a geodatabase for region 12. The data were
processed in ARCGIS 10.1 using a topology object with a 0.1 meter cluster
tolerance for the purpose of eliminating gaps and overlaps within the
region 12 soils geodatabase. Individual soil survey area data were
exported as shapefiles from the regional geodatabase. A datum
transformation from NAD83 to WGS84 using the NAD_1983_To_WGS_1984_1 datum
transformation method was applied to the data. The data were checked with
the SSURGO Evaluation scripts provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service. The shapefiles were then uploaded
to the soil data warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS12
Process_Date: 2013
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20131124
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20131124
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20140916
Process_Step:
Process_Description: Soil interpretation factors K, T, WEG, WEI, concrete corrosion potential, and steel corrosion potential were calculated based on national standard parameters.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20140916
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20150924
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20150924
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20160924
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20160924