Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation
Service
Publication_Date: 1973
Title: Soil Survey of Monroe County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: atlas
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Washington, D.C.
Publisher: U.S. Government Printing Office
Source_Scale_Denominator: 15840
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1967
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1
Source_Contribution:
source of soil map unit delineations, soil
symbols and special soil features
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation
Service
Publication_Date: 1973
Title: publication annotation overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation
Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center
Source_Scale_Denominator: 15840
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1967
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS2
Source_Contribution:
final publication negatives used to develop
ratioed film positives
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: ratioed film positives of publication annotation overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1967
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1
Source_Contribution:
source material for compiling to compilation
base
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: multiple 3.75 minute orthophotographic quadrangles
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1994
Ending_Date: 1995
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS2
Source_Contribution: base material for compilation
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 1950-1971
Title: multiple 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Reston, Virginia
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1950
Ending_Date: 1970
Source_Currentness_Reference: final publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS1
Source_Contribution: source for county boundaries
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: annotated soil delineation overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1994
Ending_Date: 1995
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS3
Source_Contribution: scanning source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2003
Title:
National Soil Information System (NASIS) database
for Monroe County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, Information Technology
Center
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2003
Source_Currentness_Reference: export certification date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS4
Source_Contribution: tabular data linked to spatial soil data
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2000
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Monroe
County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography
and Geospatial Center
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2000
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS5
Source_Contribution: re-archiving source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2004
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: unknown
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Type_of_Source_Media: database
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2004
Ending_Date: 2004
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Source_Contribution: attribute (tabular) information
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 20040308
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Monroe
County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography
and Geospatial Center
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20040308
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS6
Source_Contribution: re-archiving source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2005
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Monroe
County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography
and Geospatial Center
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2005
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS7
Source_Contribution: re-archiving source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency
Publication_Date: 2008
Title: NAIP imagery for Monroe County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency APFO
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2008
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: FSA1
Source_Contribution: editing selected water and soil polygon boundaries to current imagery
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: ARCGIS geodatabase for Monroe County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
Type_of_Source_Media: CD-ROM
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2009
Source_Currentness_Reference: date of soil survey update
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS8
Source_Contribution: source for digital revision
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2004-2007
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) databases
for adjacent surveys
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
Information Technology Center
Other_Citation_Details:
These SSURGO certified soil surveys are adjacent to
the Soil Survey of (NY055) Monroe County, New York:
NY037 Genesee County, New York
NY051 Livingston County, New York
NY069 Ontario County, New York
NY073 Orleans County, New York
NY117 Wayne County, New York
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000, 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2004
Ending_Date: 2007
Source_Currentness_Reference: dates of publication
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS9
Source_Contribution: used to check joins to the adjacent soil surveys
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 20100218
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database
for Monroe County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20100218
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS10
Source_Contribution:
certified SSURGO product used as source
for digital revision
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title:
ARCGIS geodatabase for the Soil Survey of
Monroe County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
Type_of_Source_Media: geographic database
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2012
Source_Currentness_Reference: date of digitizing completion
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS11
Source_Contribution: source for digital review
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: region 12 soils geodatabase
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: file geodatabase
Type_of_Source_Media: vector digital data
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2006
Ending_Date: 2012
Source_Currentness_Reference: SSURGO publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS12
Source_Contribution: Source of digital revision
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Monroe County had a previously published soil
survey, 1973, at 1:15840 scale. An evaluation was made of the soil
survey in 1998. It was determined that the soil map unit
delineations and map unit components were accurate.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1
Process_Date: 1998
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Ratioed film positives, at 1:12000 scale, were
made from the final publication negatives. Soil map unit
delineations, soil symbols and special soil features were manually
compiled from the ratioed film positives to an overlay registered
to 3.75 minute orthophotographic quadrangles. Errors from the
published soil survey were corrected and map unit boundaries were
refined as needed to the orthophotographic image.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS2, NRCS1, NRCS2
Process_Date: 1999
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The 3.75 minute annotated soil delineation
overlays were raster scanned by Midwest Graphics, Kenosha,
Wisconsin at 250 dpi on an Intergraph Anatech scanner in rlc
format. Four control points corresponding to the four corners
on the 3.75 minute quadrangles were used for registration during
data collection. The data were sent to the Wisconsin Digitizing
Unit, Madison, Wisconsin. The borders were manually digitized from
the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles in
LT4X Version 4.1.1 on a Sun UNIX Workstation, exported to GRASS,
snapped together using GRASS Version 4.13 and imported back into
LT4X. The special soil features were manually digitized from the
scanning source in LT4X Version 4.1.1 at a resolution of at least
0.01 inch. The raster editing, labeling, edge matching, vector
conversion and editing were done in LT4X Version 4.1.1. The data
were created and maintained in North American Datum of 1983. Check
plots of the soils and special soil features data were reviewed by
a soil scientist and cartographic staff at the Wisconsin Digitizing
Unit, Madison, Wisconsin. A ten percent check plot review was done
of the soils and special soils features by the Major Land Resources
Area (MLRA) in Amherst, Massachusetts. The soils and special soil
features data were run through a series of LT4X macros of
correctness and completeness. These macros smoothed out and
thinned out linework, added nodes for every 3000 vertices, added
corner nodes and snapped nodes across the neatlines. The special
soil features data were run through an additional LT4X macro. The
digital soils and special soil features data were then exported as
Digital Line Graph-3 Optional format file in LT4X. The DLG-3
Optional format files were evaluated with the October 1998 ARC/INFO
evaluation AMLs provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and
Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas. Upon sucessful completion of
evaluating the data, the DLGs were rewritten from ARC/INFO
Version 4.11. The ARC/INFO version DLGs were rechecked with the
October 1998 ARC/INFO evaluation AMLs. The DLGs were
processed with the October 1998 archiving AMLs provided by National
Cartography and Geospatial Center.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS1, NRCS3
Process_Date: 2000
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Map Unit Interpretations Record data base
was developed by Natural Resources Conservation Service soil
scientists according to national standards.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1
Process_Date: 2000
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The National Soil Information System data
base was developed by Natural Resources Conservation Service
soil scientists according to national standards.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS4
Process_Date: 2003
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The online SSURGO data were imported into
ARC/INFO Version 7.2.1 at the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, Wisconsin Digitizing Unit. The SSURGO data were
processed with revised October 1998 AMLs. Minor codes
were replaced to link spatial data map unit labels with the
National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base. New SSURGO
DLGs were written. The SSURGO data and NASIS SSURGO tabular
download were archived with April 2001 Version Archiving AMLs
provided by the National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort
Worth, Texas (NCGC). The data were ftped to NCGC for archiving and
distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS4, NRCS5
Process_Date: 2003
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 2004
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 2004
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The tabular data were extracted from the data mart
without change. The spatial data's coordinate system was transformed to
UTM Zone 17, Northern Hemisphere (NAD 83) using ESRI ArcObjects 8.3
"ConvertFeatureClass" and exported to an ESRI shapefile. ESRI
ArcInfo/Workstation 8.3 was used to read the shapefile, clean the double
precision cover with a dangle length of 0.000001 and a fuzzy tolerance
of 0.000001.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 2004
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The SSURGO database of Monroe County,
New York was downloaded from U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography
and Geospatial Center (NCGC) distribution site for the purpose
of updating soil line and to be consistent with the Orleans
County, New York SSURGO dataset. The data were then run through the
20040524 ReCert AMLs provided by NCGC and submitted to the Soil Data
Warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS5
Process_Date: 2004
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The SSURGO database of Monroe County,
New York was downloaded from U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography
and Geospatial Center (NCGC) distribution site for the purpose
of updating the survey area boundary to be consistent with the Ontario
County, New York SSURGO dataset. The data were then run through the
20040524 ReCert AMLs provided by NCGC and submitted to the Soil Data
Warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS6
Process_Date: 2005
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20050506
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051212
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051214
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060710
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060711
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061210
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Soil scientists entered/edited data in NASIS for geomorphic description
and selected chemical and physical properties.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate
verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units
in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to
the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp
were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data
for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and
reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil
Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061211
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20070823
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20070824
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The soils staff in New York downloaded the SSURGO data for Monroe
County from the Soil Data Warehouse. Water polygons and adjacent soil
polygons in the existing SSURGO spatial data were reviewed against the
1973 hardcopy soil survey atlas sheets and the 2008 NAIP imagery.
The digital mapping was revised where water polygons were determined
to be ponded soil, so that the spatial data corresponds more closely
with the original hard copy atlas sheets. Some edits to other polygons
were made based on the imagery and atlas sheets. The revised
geodatabase was sent to the Michigan Digitizing Unit (MIDU) in
East Lansing, Michigan for review and certification.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1, FSA1, NRCS7, NRCS8
Process_Date: 2009
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The MIDU staff checked the spatial data with the ARCGIS Version 9.2
software. The boundaries of this soil survey were adjusted to match
the adjacent soil surveys. To remove excess vertices, the soil
boundaries were generalized at a 0.75 meter tolerance. After the soil
survey was edited, the area, line and point feature classes were
converted to ARC/INFO coverages and exported as e00 files.
The digital maps of the mapping units and the special soil features
were imported into the ARC/INFO Version 7.2.1 software for review and
certification. The MIDU staff checked the data with a set of ARC Macro
Language (AML) programs developed by the NCGC. The seamless coverages
were checked using the January 2006 SSURGO Evaluation AML programs.
Upon successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the county
coverages, feature file and the metadata were electronically
transferred to the NRCS Staging Server to be joined with
the tabular data.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS8, NRCS9
Process_Date: 20100212
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20100203
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Soil scientists reviewed and edited data for hydric rating and hydric
criteria. Interpretations for storm water management were added to the set
of interpretations. The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil
Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map
units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version
number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data
warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted
from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data
model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to
the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20100218
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20111207
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Hydric ratings for minor soil components were included in the data set.
Hydrologic Soil Group data was updated to current criteria.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate
verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units
in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to
the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp
were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data
for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and
reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil
Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20111207
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The staff at the Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) Soil Survey Office in
Belmont, New York downloaded the Soil SURvey GeOgraphic (SSURGO)
dataset for Monroe County, New York from the Soil Data Mart (SDM).
Mapping along the join with Ontario County, New York has been adjusted
according to field work conducted by the NRCS soil scientists. After
the edits were completed, the geodatabase for the soil survey was
forwarded to the certification team at the Michigan Digitizing Unit
(MIDU) in East Lansing, Michigan.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS10, NRCS11
Process_Date: 2012
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The MIDU staff checked the spatial data with the ARCGIS Version 10.0
software. The boundaries of this soil survey were adjusted to match
the adjacent soil surveys. To remove excess vertices, the soil
boundaries were generalized at a 0.5 meter tolerance. After the soil
survey was edited, the area, line and point feature classes were
converted to ARC/INFO coverages. The digital maps of the mapping units
and the special soil features were imported into the ARC/INFO
Version 10.0 software for review and certification. The MIDU staff
checked the data with a set of ARC Macro Language (AML) programs
developed by the USDA-NRCS National Cartographic and Geospatial Center
(NCGC). The seamless coverages were checked using the July 2009 SSURGO
Evaluation AML programs. The labels in the spatial data match the
symbols in the soils tables archived at the Soil Data Warehouse (SDW).
Upon successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the area, line and
point coverages, the feature file and the metadata were electronically
transferred to the NRCS Staging Server to be joined with the tabular data.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS11, NASIS
Process_Date: 2012
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20120925
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The spatial data for Monroe County, New York soil survey area was
downloaded from the Soil Data Mart on October 15, 2012. The individual
shapefiles were appended into a geodatabase for region 12. The data were
processed in ARCGIS 10.1 using a topology object with a 0.1 meter cluster
tolerance for the purpose of eliminating gaps and overlaps within the
region 12 soils geodatabase. Individual soil survey area data were
exported as shapefiles from the regional geodatabase. A datum
transformation from NAD83 to WGS84 using the NAD_1983_To_WGS_1984_1 datum
transformation method was applied to the data. The data were checked with
the SSURGO Evaluation scripts provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service. The shapefiles were then uploaded
to the soil data warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS12
Process_Date: 2013
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20131124
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20131124
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20140915
Process_Step:
Process_Description: Soil interpretation factors K, T, WEG, WEI, concrete corrosion potential, and steel corrosion potential were calculated based on national standard parameters.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20140915
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20150924
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20150924
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20160923
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20160923