Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1985
Title: multiple photographs
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural
Stabilization and Conservation Service
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1985
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photographs were flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: ASCS1
Source_Contribution: materials for field mapping
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 1985
Title: multiple orthophoto quadrangle negatives
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Menlo Park, California
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1985
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photographs were flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS1
Source_Contribution: compilation base map source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2002
Title:
Digital Raster Graphic Mosaic
of Cattaraugus County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
National Cartographic and Geospatial Center
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1954
Ending_Date: 1995
Source_Currentness_Reference: inspected revision date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1
Source_Contribution: source for digital county borders
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: multiple photobase film positives of orthophotoquads
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote sensing image
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1985
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS2
Source_Contribution: planimetrically correct base map for compilation
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Bureau of Plant Industry
Publication_Date: 1940
Title: Soil Survey of Cattaraugus County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: atlas
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Washington, D.C.
Publisher: U.S. Government Printing Office
Source_Scale_Denominator: 62500
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1940
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: BPI1
Source_Contribution:
information for soil map unit delineations, special
feature locations, and data on soil properties
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: compiled field mapping on orthophotos
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote sensing image
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2002
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS3
Source_Contribution:
digitizing source for special soil features
and soil attributes, source material for soil
delineation scan overlays
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1998
Title: multiple 7.5 minute orthophotographic quadrangles
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
National Cartography and Geospatial Center
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1994
Ending_Date: 1995
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS4
Source_Contribution:
base material for updating compilation and
a reference for compilation of cultural features
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: soil delineation overlay
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2002
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS5
Source_Contribution: scanning source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2003
Title:
National Soil Information System (NASIS) database
for Cattaraugus County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
Information Technology Center
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2003
Source_Currentness_Reference: export certification date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS6
Source_Contribution: tabular data linked to spatial soil data
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2004
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: unknown
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Type_of_Source_Media: database
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2004
Ending_Date: 2006
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Source_Contribution: attribute (tabular) information
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
Pennsylvania Map Compilation and Digitizing Center
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title:
Cattaraugus County, New York,
digital soil ArcInfo coverage files
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector data
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2004
Source_Currentness_Reference: date submitted for SSURGO certification
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS7
Source_Contribution: source for SSURGO evaluation
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 20041021
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for
Cattaraugus County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20041021
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS8
Source_Contribution: re-archiving source for special soil features
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 20050509
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database
for Cattaraugus County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20050509
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS9
Source_Contribution: re-archiving source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2004 - 2009
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Databases for adjacent
soil surveys
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
Information Technology Center
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000, 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2004
Ending_Date: 2009
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS10
Source_Contribution:
used to check the joins with:
(NY003) Allegany County Area
(NY013) Chautauqua County
(NY029) Erie County
(NY121) Wyoming County
(NY605) Seneca Nation of Indians
(PA083) McKean County
(PA609) Warren and Forest Counties
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2009
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database
for Cattaraugus County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
National Cartography and Geospatial Center
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2009
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS11
Source_Contribution: re-archiving source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency
Publication_Date: 2009
Title: NAIP imagery for Cattaraugus County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency APFO
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2009
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: FSA1
Source_Contribution: editing selected water and soil polygon boundaries to current imagery
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: ARCGIS geodatabase for Cattaraugus County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: CD-ROM
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2009
Source_Currentness_Reference: date of soil survey update
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS12
Source_Contribution: source for digital revision
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency- APFO
Publication_Date: 2011
Title: NAIP- multiple aerial photographs
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency- APFO
Type_of_Source_Media: digital
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2011
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: FSA2
Source_Contribution:
Photographic base materials for field mapping and source material for
digitizing of soil polygons, map unit symbols, and special soil features.
This source info was used along the boundary with Allegay County, NY for
adjusting soil polgyons to attain a seamless join between the counties.
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: region 12 soils geodatabase
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: file geodatabase
Type_of_Source_Media: vector digital data
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2006
Ending_Date: 2012
Source_Currentness_Reference: SSURGO publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS13
Source_Contribution: Source of digital revision
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Cattaraugus County, New York, had a previously published soil survey,
1940, at 1:62500 scale. A detailed evaluation found that significant
changes in land use, soil classification, soil interpretations and
standards and procedures for making soil surveys made the 1940
survey obsolete.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: BPI1
Process_Date: 1983
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Field procedures for the second order soil survey included plotting
of soil boundaries by field observation and by interpretation of
remotely sensed data. Boundaries were verified at closely spaced
intervals, and the soils in each delineation were identified by
traversing and transecting the landscape. Soil scientists described
and sampled the soils, analyzed samples in the laboratory and
statistically analyzed the data. The classification and map unit
names were finalized at the final correlation in April, 2002.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: ASCS1
Process_Date: 2002
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Field maps were manually compiled to stable-base overlays of
1:24000 scale orthophoto quadrangles derived from aerial photography
from 1985, and later transferred as a soil delineation overlay
registered to the 7.5 minute 1985 orthophoto quadrangles, making
adjustments at the same time to conform to the more recent 1994-1995
orthophoto quadrangles. The soil delineation overlays were raster
scanned by Midwest Graphics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin at 250 dpi on an
Intergraph Anatech scanner in rlc format. Four control points
corresponding to the four corners on the 7.5 minute quadrangles
were used for registration during data collection. The data were
then sent to the Wisconsin Digitizing Unit, Madison, Wisconsin.
The county borders were manually digitized from the Digital Raster
Graphic (DRG) of Cattauragus County in Arc/GIS Version 8.2, converted
to an Arc/Info coverage, snapped together using Arc/Info
Version 7.1.1, converted into a DXF file, and then imported back into
LT4X. The special soil features were manually digitized from the
digitizing source in LT4X at a resolution of at least 0.01 inch.
The raster editing, labeling, edge matching, vector conversion,
and editing were done in LT4X Version 4.02. The data were created and
maintained in North American Datum of 1983. Check plots of the soils
and special soil features were reviewed by a soil scientist and
cartographic staff at the Wisconsin Digitizing Unit, Madison,
Wisconsin and the New York State Office, Syracuse, New York. The
digital files were written to a Digital Line Graph-3 Optional
format using LT4X. The DLG-3 Optional format files were processed
with the ARC/INFO SSURGO February 1998 Evaluation AMLs provided
by U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), National Cartography and Geospatial
Center (NCGC) in Fort Worth, Texas. Upon successful completion of
SSURGO Evaluation the DLGs were rewritten from ARC/INFO Version 7.1.1.
The new ARC/INFO DLGs were rechecked with the February 1998 SSURGO
Evaluation AMLs. The new DLGs were processed with the June 1998
archiving AMLs provided by the staff at NCGC.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: ASCS1, NRCS1, USGS1, NRCS2, NRCS3, NRCS4, NRCS5
Process_Date: 2003
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Map Unit Interpretations Record (MUIR) database was developed
by NRCS soil soil scientists according to national standards.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS6
Process_Date: 2003
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20040303
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20040303
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20041021
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20041021
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The spatial data's coordinate system was transformed to UTM Zone 17,
Northern Hemisphere (NAD 83) using ESRI ArcObjects 8.3
"ConvertFeatureClass" and exported to an ESRI shapefile.
ESRI ArcInfo/Workstation 8.3 was used to read the shapefile,
clean the double precision cover with a dangle length of 0.000001
and a fuzzy tolerance of 0.000001.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20050301
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The spatial data were edited for join purposes with adjacent
Pennsylvania Counties, Warren/Forest and McKean by the USDA-NRCS
Pennsylvania Map Compilation and Digitizing Center in University
Park, Pennsylvania. The seamless ArcInfo coverage file was submitted
to the NRCS Wisconsin Digitizing Unit in Madison, Wisconsin. The
data were evaluated in ARC/INFO, Version 7.2.1 software with SSURGO
evaluation routines provided by USDA-NRCS, National Cartography and
Geospatial Center in Fort Worth, Texas (NCGC). Upon successful
completion of the SSURGO certification AMLs, the data were submitted
to the Soil Data Warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS7, NRCS8
Process_Date: 2005
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20050307
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20050307
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20050310
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20050310
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The SSURGO database of Cattaraugus County Area, New York was
downloaded from the USDA-NRCS, National Cartography and Geospatial
Center (NCGC) distribution site for the purpose of amending the
map unit symbol of: 6 Wyalusing silt loam
to: 6A Wyalusing silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
The data were then run through the 20040524 ReCert AMLs provided by
NCGC and submitted to the Soil Data Warehouse for archival
and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS8
Process_Date: 2005
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20050509
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20050509
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051212
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051214
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060708
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060708
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061210
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Tabular data was entered/edited in NASIS for
geomorphic description and selected chemical and physical properties.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link
to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data
sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version
number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data
warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were
extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data
delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061211
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Michigan Digitizing Unit (MIDU) staff in East Lansing, Michigan
downloaded the Cattaraugus County SSURGO data from the Soil Data
Warehouse (SDW). The MIDU staff checked the spatial data with the
ARCGIS Version 9.2 software. The boundaries of this soil survey were
adjusted to match the adjacent soil surveys. To remove excess
vertices, the soil boundaries were generalized at a 0.5 meter
tolerance. After the soil survey was edited, the area, line and
point feature classes were converted to ARC/INFO coverages and
exported as e00 files. The digital maps of the mapping units and the
special soil features were imported into the ARC/INFO Version 7.2.1
software for review and certification. The MIDU staff checked
the data with a set of ARC Macro Language (AML) programs developed
by the NCGC. The seamless coverages were checked using the January
2006 SSURGO Evaluation AML programs. Upon successful completion
of the SSURGO Evaluation, the county coverages, feature file and
the metadata were electronically transferred to the NRCS Staging
Server to be joined with the tabular data.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS9, NRCS10
Process_Date: 20090828
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20090828
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
New York soil scientists downloaded the Cattaraugus County SSURGO data
from the Soil Data Warehouse (SDW). Water polygons and adjacent soil
polygons in the existing SSURGO spatial data were reviewed against the
2007 hardcopy soil survey atlas sheets and the 2008 NAIP imagery. The
digital mapping was revised where water polygons were determined to be
ponded soil, so that the spatial data corresponds more closely with the
original hard copy atlas sheets. Some edits to other polygons were made
based on the imagery and atlas sheets. The geodatabase was sent to the
Michigan Digitizing Unit (MIDU) staff in East Lansing, Michigan.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1, FSA1, NRCS11, NRCS12
Process_Date: 2009
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The MIDU staff checked the spatial data with the ARCGIS Version 9.2
software. The boundaries of this soil survey were adjusted to match
the adjacent soil surveys. To remove excess vertices, the soil
boundaries were generalized at a 0.5 meter tolerance. After the soil
survey was edited, the area, line and point feature classes were
converted to ARC/INFO coverages and exported as e00 files.
The digital maps of the mapping units and the special soil features
were imported into the ARC/INFO Version 7.2.1 software for review and
certification. The MIDU staff checked the data with a set of ARC Macro
Language (AML) programs developed by the NCGC. The seamless coverages
were checked using the January 2006 SSURGO Evaluation AML programs.
Upon successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the county
coverages, feature file and the metadata were electronically
transferred to the NRCS Staging Server to be joined with
the tabular data.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS10, NRCS12
Process_Date: 20100211
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Soil scientists reviewed and edited data for hydric rating and hydric
criteria. Interpretations for storm water management were added to the
set of interpretations. The Natural Resources Conservation Service State
Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized
soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified
the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system
assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were
copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and
components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into
the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20100212
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20111206
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Hydric ratings for minor soil components were included in the data
set. Hydrologic Soil Group data was updated to current criteria.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20111206
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20120919
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Updated hydrologic soil group for Ceres and Hartleton components.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20120921
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Changed two polygons in the southeast corner of the county in order to
establish a seamless county join with Pope and Philo map units that were
updated in Allegany County, NY and McKean County, PA.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: FSA2
Process_Date: 2013
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The individual shapefiles were appended into a geodatabase for region 12.
The data were processed in ARCGIS 10.1 using a topology object with a
0.1 meter cluster tolerance for the purpose of eliminating gaps and overlaps
within the region 12 soils geodatabase. Individual soil survey area data
were exported as shapefiles from the regional geodatabase. A datum
transformation from NAD83 to WGS84 using the NAD_1983_To_WGS_1984_1 datum
transformation method was applied to the data. The data were checked with
the SSURGO Evaluation scripts provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service. The shapefiles were then uploaded
to the soil data warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS13
Process_Date: 2013
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20131124
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20131124
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20140913
Process_Step:
Process_Description: Soil interpretation factors K, T, WEG, WEI, concrete corrosion potential, and steel corrosion potential were calculated based on national standard parameters.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20140913
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20150920
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20150920
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20160923
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20160923