Completeness_Report: A map unit is a collection of areas defined and named in terms of
their soil components or miscellaneous areas or both. Each map
unit differs in some respect from all others in a survey area and
each map unit has a symbol that uniquely identifies the map unit
on a soil map. Each individual area, point, or line so identified
on the map is a delineation.
Soil Scientists identify small areas of soils or miscellaneous areas
that have properties and behavior significantly different than the
named soils in the surrounding map unit. These minor components
may be indicated as special features. If they have a minimal effect
on use and management, or could not be precisely located, they may
not be indicated on the map.
A map unit has specified kinds of soils or miscellaneous areas
(map unit components), each with a designated range in
proportionate extent. Map units include one or more kinds of soil
or miscellaneous area. Miscellaneous areas are areas that have little
or no recognizable soil.
Specific National Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures
were used in the classification of soils, design and name of map
units, and location of special soil features. These standards are
outlined in Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993,
USDA, NRCS; Agricultural Handbook 436, Soil Taxonomy, 1995,
USDA, NRCS; and all Amendments; Keys to Soil Taxonomy,
(current issue) USDA, NRCS; National Soil Survey
Handbook, title 430-VI,(current issue) USDA, NRCS.
The actual composition and interpretive purity of the map unit
delineations were based on data collected by scientists during
the course of preparing the soil maps. Adherence to National
Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures is based on
peer review, quality control, and quality assurance. Quality
control is outlined in the memorandum of understanding for the
soil survey area and in documents that reside with the Natural
Resources Conservation Service state soil scientist. Four kinds
of map units are used in soil surveys: consociations, complexes,
associations, and undifferentiated groups.
Consociations - Consociations are named for the dominant soil.
In a consociation, delineated areas use a single name from the
dominant component in the map unit. Dissimilar components are
minor in extent. The soil component in a consociation may be
identified at any taxonomic level. Soil series is the lowest
taxonomic level. A consociation that is named as a miscellaneous
area is dominantly that kind of area and minor components do not
significantly affect the use of the map unit. The total amount of
dissimilar inclusions of other components in a map unit generally
does not exceed about 15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if
nonlimiting. A single component of a dissimilar limiting inclusion
generally does not exceed 10 percent if very contrasting.
Complexes and associations - Complexes and associations consist
of two or more dissimilar components that occur in a regularly
repeating pattern. The total amount of other dissimilar components
is minor extent. The following arbitrary rule determines whether
complex or association is used in the name. The major components
of an association can be separated at the scale of mapping. In
either case, because the major components are sufficiently different
in morphology or behavior, the map unit cannot be called a
consociation. In each delineation of a complex or an association,
each major component is normally present though their proportions
may vary appreciably from one delineation to another. The total
amount of inclusions in a map unit that are dissimilar to any of
the major components does not exceed 15 percent if limiting and
25 percent if nonlimiting. A single kind of dissimilar limiting
inclusion usually does not exceed 10 percent.
Undifferentiated groups - Undifferentiated groups consist of two
or more components that are not consistently associated
geographically and, therefore, do not always occur together in
the same map delineation. These components are included in the
same named map unit because their use and management are the same
or very similar for common uses. Generally they are grouped together
because some common feature, such as steepness, stoniness, or
flooding, determines their use and management. If two or more
additional map units would serve no useful purpose, they may be
included in the same unit. Each delineation has at least one of the
major components, and some may have all of them. The same principles
regarding the proportion of minor components that apply to
consociations also apply to undifferentiated groups. The same
principles regarding proportion of inclusion apply to
undifferentiated groups as to consociations.
Minimum documentation consists of three complete soil profile
descriptions that are collected for each soil added to the legend,
one additional per 3,000 acres mapped; three 10 observation
transects for each map unit, one additional 10 point transect per
3,000 acres.
A defined standard or level of confidence in the interpretive
purity of the map unit delineations is attained by adjusting the
kind and intensity of field investigations. Field investigations
and data collection are carried out in sufficient detail to name
map units and to identify accurately and consistently areas of
about 4 acres.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Soil Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1974
Title: Soil Survey of Wyoming County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: atlas
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Washington, D.C.
Publisher: U.S. Government Printing Office
Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1969
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1
Source_Contribution: soil attributes and special soil feature locations
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: publication annotation overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
Type_of_Source_Media: film
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1969
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1
Source_Contribution:
final publication negatives used
to develop film positives
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: ratioed film positives of publication annotated overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
Type_of_Source_Media: film
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1969
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS2
Source_Contribution:
source material for special soil features,
soil polygons and soil attributes
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1998
Title: multiple 3.75 minute orthophotographic quadrangles
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
National Cartography and Geospatial Center
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1994
Ending_Date: 1996
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS3
Source_Contribution:
base material for compilation and a reference for compilation of
cultural features
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2002
Title:
Digital Raster Graphic County Mosaic
of Wyoming County New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1949
Ending_Date: 1979
Source_Currentness_Reference: source material publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS4
Source_Contribution: source for county boundaries
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: annotated soil delineation overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1994
Ending_Date: 1996
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS5
Source_Contribution: scanning and digitizing source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2004
Title:
National Soil Information System (NASIS) database
for Wyoming County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Information Technology Center
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2004
Source_Currentness_Reference: export certification date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS6
Source_Contribution: tabular data linked to spatial soil data
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2004
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Type_of_Source_Media: database
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2004
Ending_Date: 2006
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Source_Contribution: attribute (tabular) information
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2004
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database
for Wyoming County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography
and Geospatial Center
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2004
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS7
Source_Contribution: re-archiving source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency
Publication_Date: 2008
Title: NAIP imagery for Wyoming County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Farm Service Agency APFO
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2008
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: FSA1
Source_Contribution: editing selected water and soil polygon boundaries to current imagery
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: ARCGIS geodatabase for Wyoming County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
Type_of_Source_Media: CD-ROM
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2009
Source_Currentness_Reference: date of soil survey update
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS8
Source_Contribution: source for digital revision
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2004 - 2008
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Databases for adjacent
soil surveys
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
Information Technology Center
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000, 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2004
Ending_Date: 2008
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS9
Source_Contribution:
used to check the joins with:
(NY003) Allegany County Area
(NY009) Cattaraugus County
(NY029) Erie County
(NY037) Genesee County
(NY051) Livingston County
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency- APFO
Publication_Date: 2011
Title: NAIP- multiple aerial photographs
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency- APFO
Type_of_Source_Media: digital
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2011
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: FSA2
Source_Contribution:
Photographic base materials for field mapping and source material for
digitizing of soil polygons, map unit symbols, and special soil features.
This source info was used along the boundary with Allegay County, NY for
adjusting soil polgyons to attain a seamless join between the counties.
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: region 12 soils geodatabase
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: file geodatabase
Type_of_Source_Media: vector digital data
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2006
Ending_Date: 2012
Source_Currentness_Reference: SSURGO publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS10
Source_Contribution: Source of digital revision
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Wyoming County had a previously published soil survey in 1974, at
1:20000 scale. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2001.
It was determined that the soil map unit delineations and map unit
components were accurate.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1
Process_Date: 2001
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Ratioed film positives, at 1:12000 scale, were made from the
publication annotation overlays. Soil map unit delineations,
soil symbols and special soil features were manually compiled from
the film positives to stable-base material registered to 3.75 minute
orthophotographic quadrangles. Errors from the published soil survey
were corrected and map unit boundaries were refined, as needed to
the orthophotographic quadrangles.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1, NRCS2, NRCS3
Process_Date: 2003
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base was developed
by Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil scientists
according to national standards.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1, NRCS6
Process_Date: 2004
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The data were sent to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA),
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Wisconsin Digitizing
Unit (WIDU) in Madison, Wisconsin. The annotated soil delineation
overlays were sent to Midwest Graphics, Kenosha, Wisconsin for raster
scanning at 250 dpi on an Intergraph Anatach scanner in rlc and TIF
format. The raster scanned data were imported into LT4X Version 4.1.1
maps. Once all the scanned soil lines were added to the maps, a
county border was added. The border was digitized onscreen from the
DRG and ortho mosaic in ARCGIS. The special soil features were
digitized on screen in LT2000 using geo referenced TIF files derived
from the annotated soil delineation overlays. The raster editing,
labeling, edge matching, and vector conversion were done in LT2000.
Check plots of the soils and special soil features were reviewed by
a soil scientist and the cartographic staff at the WIDU. A ten
percent quality assurance review was done of the soils and special
features by the Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) office in Amherst,
Massachusetts. The soils and special soil features data were run
through a series of LT2000 macros for correctness and completeness.
These macros smoothed and thinned out line work, added nodes for
every 3000 vertices, added corner nodes and snapped nodes across
the neatlines. The soils and special soil features data were then
exported as Digital Line Graph-3 Optional format files (DLGs) in
LT2000. The DLGs were evaluated with the modified October 1998
ARC/INFO SSURGO Evaluation AMLs provided by the USDA-NRCS National
Cartography and Geospatial Center (NCGC) in Fort Worth, Texas.
Upon successful completion of the SSURGO evaluation, the SSURGO data
were processed with the 20040524 recert AMLs provided by NCGC and
submitted to the Soil Data Warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS4, NRCS5, NRCS6
Process_Date: 2004
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20040921
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20040921
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20041004
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20041004
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051212
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051214
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060710
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060711
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061211
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Soil scientists entered/edited data in NASIS for
geomorphic description and selected chemical and physical properties.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the
joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse.
A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and
the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for
the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse
and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored
in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061213
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The soil scientists at the Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS) State Office in Syracuse, New York downloaded the survey-wide
coverages for Soil Survey Area (NY121) Wyoming County, New York
from the Soil Data Warehouse (SDW). The coverages were imported into
an ARCGIS geodatatabase that would be submitted to the Michigan
Digitizing Unit (MIDU) for re-certification. The water polygons and
adjacent soil polygons in the existing SSURGO spatial data were
reviewed against the 1994 hardcopy soil survey atlas sheets and the
2008 NAIP imagery. The digital mapping was revised with ARCMAP where
water polygons were determined to be ponded soil, so that the spatial
data corresponds more closely with the original hard copy atlas
sheets. Some edits to other polygons were made based on the imagery
and atlas sheets. The data were checked for any topology errors and
common lines and sent to the MIDU in East Lansing, Michigan for
recertification.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1, FSA1, NRCS8, NRCS9
Process_Date: 2009
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The MIDU staff checked the spatial data with the ARCGIS Version 9.2
software. The MIDU staff downloaded the adjacent surveys from the
SDW. The boundaries of this soil survey were adjusted to match
the adjacent soil surveys. To remove excess vertices, the soil
boundaries were generalized at a 0.5 meter tolerance. After the soil
survey was edited, the area, line and point feature classes were
converted to ARC/INFO coverages and exported as e00 files.
The digital maps of the mapping units and the special soil features
were imported into the ARC/INFO Version 7.2.1 software for review and
certification. The MIDU staff checked the data with a set of ARC Macro
Language (AML) programs developed by the NCGC. The seamless coverages
were checked using the January 2006 SSURGO Evaluation AML programs.
Upon successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the county
coverages, feature file and the metadata were electronically
transferred to the NRCS Staging Server to be joined with
the tabular data.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS8, NRCS9
Process_Date: 20090827
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20090828
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20100204
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Soil scientists reviewed and edited data for hydric rating and hydric
criteria. Interpretations for storm water management were added to the set
of interpretations. The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil
Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map
units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version
number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data
warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted
from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data
model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to
the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20100205
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20111208
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Hydric ratings for minor soil components were included in the data set.
Hydrologic Soil Group data was updated to current criteria.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate
verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units
in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to
the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp
were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data
for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and
reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil
Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20111208
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
During the process of conforming the river boundaries in Allegany County
with the most recent imagery, soil and water polygons along the
Genesee River at the county join between Wyoming and Allegany counties
were adjusted in order to establish a seamless county join.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: FSA2
Process_Date: 2013
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The individual shapefiles were appended into a geodatabase for region 12.
The data were processed in ARCGIS 10.1 using a topology object with a
0.1 meter cluster tolerance for the purpose of eliminating gaps and overlaps
within the region 12 soils geodatabase. Individual soil survey area data
were exported as shapefiles from the regional geodatabase. A datum
transformation from NAD83 to WGS84 using the NAD_1983_To_WGS_1984_1 datum
transformation method was applied to the data. The data were checked with
the SSURGO Evaluation scripts provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service. The shapefiles were then uploaded
to the soil data warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS10
Process_Date: 2013
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20131210
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20131210
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20140917
Process_Step:
Process_Description: Soil interpretation factors K, T, WEG, WEI, concrete corrosion potential, and steel corrosion potential were calculated based on national standard parameters.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20140917
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20150925
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20150925
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20160924
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20160924